English

English

Get a Quote
News
  • Top 10 Industrial Valve Manufacturers in China for 2026: How to Choose the Right Supplier
    Top 10 Industrial Valve Manufacturers in China for 2026: How to Choose the Right Supplier Oct 22, 2026
    1. Suzhou Neway Valve Co., Ltd. — NEWAY NEWAY is one of China's most internationally recognized industrial valve manufacturers. Its product range includes ball valves, gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, cryogenic valves, subsea valves, and other engineered valve solutions. The company has strong experience in oil and gas, LNG, petrochemical, offshore, and power applications.   Best suited for: large-scale energy projects and severe-service applications. 2. CNNC Sufa Technology Industry Co., Ltd. CNNC SUFA is well known for its experience in nuclear power and other high-integrity industrial applications. The company has strong capabilities in material traceability, engineering control, testing, and specialized valve manufacturing. Its products are also used in petroleum, petrochemical, power, and chemical industries.   Best suited for: nuclear power, high-integrity systems, and technically demanding projects. 3. DERVOS VALVE DERVOS VALVE supplies industrial valves to customers in oil and gas, petrochemical, power generation, water treatment, marine, and general industrial applications. Its main products include ball valves, gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, plug valves, knife gate valves, line blind valves, and strainers. DERVOS supports international standards such as API, ASME, EN, and DIN, and can provide carbon steel, stainless steel, alloy steel, duplex stainless steel, low-temperature steel, and other materials. One of its key strengths is flexibility. DERVOS can support mixed valve packages, small-to-medium quantities, customized specifications, and project-specific documentation.   Best suited for: overseas distributors, EPC projects, customized valves, mixed orders, and flexible sourcing requirements.   4. Yuanda Valve Group Yuanda Valve Group is one of China's large-scale valve manufacturers with broad production capacity. Its product range includes gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, ball valves, and other general industrial valves. The company is widely involved in water supply, HVAC, municipal infrastructure, power, and industrial pipeline projects. Best suited for: large-volume standardized valve procurement and general industrial applications.   5. Jiangsu Shentong Valve Co., Ltd. Jiangsu Shentong focuses strongly on specialized valve applications in metallurgy, energy, nuclear power, and chemical industries. Its strength lies in engineered products for demanding operating conditions rather than only standard valve production. Best suited for: metallurgy, energy, chemical processing, and specialized industrial applications.   6. Chaoda Valves Group Co., Ltd. Chaoda Valves Group serves petroleum, chemical, natural gas, power, and other process industries. Its product range includes ball valves, gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, and special-purpose industrial valves. The company has experience with corro...
    View More
  • Why Does a Check Valve Slam After Pump Shutdown? Causes and Non-Slam Design Options
    Why Does a Check Valve Slam After Pump Shutdown? Causes and Non-Slam Design Options Oct 22, 2026
    A check valve slams after pump shutdown when flow reverses before the closure member reaches its seat. The valve then stops that reverse velocity abruptly, creating a pressure wave through the piping. The damaging event is usually the rapid arrest of the liquid column, not simply the disc hitting the seat. A “non-slam” label alone is not a solution; the valve response must suit the system's flow deceleration.   The Valve Is Closing Too Late for the Shutdown Transient   When pump torque disappears, forward velocity falls. Static head, a pressurised common header or another running pump may then drive liquid back toward the stopped pump. If inertia and hinge friction keep a conventional swing disc open through zero flow, reverse velocity develops before the disc reaches its seat.   High static lift, a steep rising main, short pump coast-down, parallel pumps and high initial velocity can accelerate this reversal. A long-stroke or high-inertia valve is more likely to lag. This is why the same valve may run quietly in one system and slam in another: nominal size and pressure class do not define shutdown behaviour.   Confirm the Event Before Changing the Valve   A single hard bang after shutdown points toward check-valve closure or another surge event. Continuous clicking during forward flow is chatter, which more often indicates unstable partial opening, pulsation or poor hydraulic sizing.   Record the stop command, motor speed decay, flow direction and pressures on both sides of the valve on a common time base. A high-speed video of an external lever or position indicator can help show when the valve closes. For consequential systems, fast pressure logging is more reliable than sound alone.   Inspect the hinge, shaft, spring and seat for friction, wear, deposits or damage, and verify the permitted installation orientation. Check pipe supports as well; the pressure wave may produce its loudest noise away from the valve.   Non-Slam Designs Use Different Closing Strategies   An axial-flow or nozzle check valve uses a light, centrally guided disc, short travel and spring assistance. It begins closing as forward flow falls, ideally seating before appreciable reversal. It is a strong candidate for rapid pump trips, but pressure loss, cracking pressure, minimum stable flow, orientation and tolerance of solids still matter.   A spring-assisted dual-plate valve uses two lighter plates and shorter travel than a conventional swing disc. Its compact construction can improve response, but “dual plate” does not mean slam-free. Plate inertia, spring torque, size and mounting position remain relevant.   Tilting-disc, resilient-hinge and spring-assisted swing designs reduce travel or assist closure while retaining a relatively open flow path. They can suit large water lines where energy loss matters, provided dynamic data supports the selected design and size.   Large pumping mains ma...
    View More
  • Will a Line Blind Spill Product During Changeover? Open vs Non-Spill vs Enclosed Designs
    Will a Line Blind Spill Product During Changeover? Open vs Non-Spill vs Enclosed Designs Oct 16, 2026
    Yes, an open-body line blind can release residual product when it changes between the open and blind positions. A non-spill design does not make that residue disappear; it catches the liquid in a partial enclosure and directs it to a drain. An enclosed design can provide better control of liquid and vapour, but only when its housing, drain, vent and purge connections are engineered for the service. None of these labels should be read as permission to move the blind under live line pressure.   Why Product Can Escape During Changeover   When a line blind is fully clamped, its seals contain the process and the solid plate provides positive isolation in the blind position. Changeover is different. The sealing faces must separate before the spectacle or sliding plate can move. During that interval, the body cavity and plate path may be open to the surrounding area.   The line should already be isolated, depressurised and drained, but “drained” rarely means perfectly dry. Liquid can remain as a film on the plate, collect in the lower body, or sit in a poorly drained pipe pocket. Gas service may leave flammable, toxic or odorous vapour. The amount released therefore depends as much on piping layout and the shutdown procedure as on the line blind itself.   The Three Designs Manage Residue Differently   Open-body design   Residual liquid can drip from the exposed plate path into a temporary tray or the work area, while vapour disperses locally. This arrangement can suit water, steam condensate or other manageable media where easy access and visual inspection matter. It presents the highest potential for floor contamination and operator exposure.   Non-spill design   A bottom-and-side cover catches drips and sends them to a drain or recovery container; the top may remain open. This design is commonly considered for fuel terminals, marine service and liquid duties where ground or deck contamination must be controlled. It reduces dripping but may not contain vapour, and a blocked drain defeats its purpose.   Enclosed design   A housing surrounds more or all of the plate travel and may connect to a closed drain, purge, vent, flare or vapour-recovery system. It is better suited to toxic, flammable, odorous or environmentally sensitive service requiring controlled containment. The tradeoff is greater complexity in purging, inspection and maintenance, together with the need to manage trapped pressure deliberately.   These names are not perfectly standardised across manufacturers. One supplier's “non-spill” model may be open at the top, while another product described as enclosed may use a more complete casing. The RFQ should show the enclosure arrangement and identify every opening rather than relying on the product name.   Non-Spill Does Not Automatically Mean Zero Release   For a liquid with low volatility, catching the remaining drops and routing them into a closed contai...
    View More
  • How Often Do You Open the Pipeline? When Is a Line Blind Valve Worth Installing?
    How Often Do You Open the Pipeline? When Is a Line Blind Valve Worth Installing? Sep 30, 2026
    A line blind valve is worth evaluating when a pipeline is blinded several times a year, or when one conventional changeover causes hours of shutdown, lifting work or significant exposure to hazardous residue. No universal cycle count guarantees payback. A large critical line operated twice a year may justify the investment, while a small accessible line operated monthly may not.   The decision should be based on the cost and risk of each complete isolation event, not frequency alone.   There Is No Standard “Two Operations per Year” Rule   Some suppliers use one or two annual changeovers as a screening threshold. That can start a discussion, but it is not an engineering rule. Frequency has very different consequences on a DN50 utility line and a DN600 process-gas main.   For a preliminary review, the following bands are useful but not mandatory: Blinding frequency  Initial interpretation Once per major turnaround or less A removable blind or spectacle blind is often more economical. One to three times per year Compare labor, lifting, outage duration and medium risk carefully. Quarterly to monthly A quick-action line blind is normally a strong candidate. Weekly or more often Purpose-built or automated isolation deserves detailed review; also confirm that a line blind is suitable for the required cycle duty.   A low operating frequency can still support installation when every event requires scaffolding, a crane, several pipefitters or a long production interruption. Conversely, frequent operation does not justify a line blind if the process cannot accommodate its pressure, temperature, materials or maintenance needs.   Count the Complete Changeover   Traditional blinding is more than moving a plate. After the line is made safe, workers loosen bolting, spread the flange joint, handle the blind or spacer, replace gaskets, restore alignment, tighten the joint and complete leak checks. Large sizes add rigging and access equipment.   A quick-action line blind keeps the spectacle or sliding plate supported inside the installed assembly. Manufacturer literature commonly reports one-person changeover in minutes rather than the man-hours needed for conventional flange work. Those figures are useful for screening, but the project calculation should use the plant’s own procedures and recorded shutdown times.   Use a simple comparison: Annual avoided cost = operations per year x cost avoided per operation   Avoided cost may include pipefitter hours, rigging, scaffolding, gaskets and bolting, leak testing and the production value of saved time. Keep categories separate to avoid double counting. Compare the annual saving with the line blind’s additional installed price and maintenance cost.   Risk Can Matter More Than Simple Payback   Repeated flange separation creates opportunities for residual-medium exposure, damaged flange faces, poor alignment and inconsistent bolt load...
    View More
  • Blind Valve vs Blind Flange: Which Is Better When a Pipeline Needs to Be Opened Often?
    Blind Valve vs Blind Flange: Which Is Better When a Pipeline Needs to Be Opened Often? Sep 30, 2026
    When a pipeline must be opened and positively isolated often, a line blind valve is usually the better choice. It keeps the blind mechanism permanently installed and lets operators change between open and blocked positions without repeatedly removing a bolted end closure. A blind flange costs less and has fewer moving parts, but it is better suited to closing a pipe end that will remain closed for long periods.   This answer assumes that “blind flange” means a solid flange bolted to the end of a pipe or nozzle. A spectacle blind or a removable spade installed between two flanges is a different device, although it creates a similar solid-metal isolation barrier.   Frequent Opening Changes the Cost Calculation   The purchase price favors the blind flange. Its construction is simple, and maintenance is largely limited to checking the flange face, gasket, studs and nuts. If the closure will be disturbed only during an occasional turnaround, that simplicity is difficult to beat.   Repeated opening changes the picture. Removing a blind flange requires the line to be shut down, depressurized, drained or purged, and verified safe. The bolts must then be loosened, the flange supported and the sealing faces separated. Larger flanges may require lifting equipment. Reassembly introduces a new gasket, controlled bolt tightening and a leak test. None of these steps is unusual, but repeating them turns a low-cost component into a labor-intensive operating method.   A line blind valve also requires the line to be isolated and depressurized before changing position unless its approved design and operating procedure explicitly state otherwise. Its advantage is mechanical handling: the plate, spacer or sliding element remains captured in the body, and the mechanism separates, moves and reclamps the sealing faces. Manual gearing may suit moderate operating forces; electric, pneumatic or hydraulic actuation may be justified for large sizes or remote operation.   The Blind Valve Reduces Handling but Adds Equipment to Maintain   For frequent switching, a blind valve can shorten the task and reduce repeated handling of heavy plates, bolts and gaskets. Its open or closed position is normally visible from the external plate or position indication, which helps field verification. It also avoids repeatedly forcing connected piping apart to insert or remove a blind.   Those benefits come with additional maintenance. Guides, screws, gearboxes, hydraulic components, seals and interlocks must remain functional. Product deposits or corrosion can obstruct plate travel, while damaged sealing surfaces can prevent reliable reclamping. The installation therefore needs drainage, cleaning access and enough surrounding clearance to complete the full movement and service the mechanism.   A blind flange has no operating mechanism to seize. However, frequent removal can damage flange faces, stretch or corrode bolting, disturb pipe al...
    View More
  • Can You Add a Line Blind Valve to an Existing Pipeline? Space, Fit and Installation Checks
    Can You Add a Line Blind Valve to an Existing Pipeline? Space, Fit and Installation Checks Sep 24, 2026
    Yes, a line blind valve can usually be added to an existing pipeline, but the job is rarely as simple as cutting out a short section and inserting the valve. The valve must fit the existing flanges and pressure class, but that is only the first check. It also needs room to release the sealing mechanism, move the blind plate, reclamp, and remain accessible for future operation. The modified pipework must then be supported, inspected and tested before it returns to service. A valve that fits between the pipe ends but cannot complete its operating stroke is not a workable retrofit.   Start With the Full Operating Envelope   Face-to-face length tells you how much pipe must be removed. It does not tell you how much space the valve needs once it starts moving. A swing-type line blind needs a clear arc for the spectacle plate. That space may extend well beyond the valve body. Nearby pipework, cable trays, handrails, platforms, insulation and structural steel can all block the movement. A sliding design needs enough space for the plate to travel sideways or vertically. The drive mechanism, gearbox, hydraulic cylinder or actuator adds another clearance requirement. Check the manufacturer’s general arrangement drawing for: ● Face-to-face length ● Maximum body width and height ● Full plate travel or swing radius ● Handwheel, gearbox or actuator clearance ● Space needed to remove seals and internal parts ● Lifting points and rigging access ● Safe standing position for the operator   Do not measure only from the valve centerline. A gear operator may clear the adjacent pipe while the blind plate still strikes it halfway through the stroke. Orientation matters too. On vertical piping, some designs require a specific mechanism position so gravity cannot pull an unclamped component out of place. Manufacturer instructions for one cam-operated design, for example, call for the cam mechanism to be installed below the spectacle plate on a vertical line.    Check the Existing Pipeline Before Choosing the Valve   Old drawings are useful, but the final fit should be based on field measurements. Existing pipelines may have been repaired, rerouted or pulled out of alignment since the original drawings were issued. Record the actual: ● Pipe outside diameter and schedule ● Flange standard, size, class and facing ● Distance between flange faces or proposed cut points ● Pipe centerline and flange orientation ● Available movement in the existing line ● Insulation and heat-tracing thickness ● Nearby supports, guides and expansion joints ● Operating and design pressure and temperature ● Medium, corrosion allowance and material specification   Flanges that appear similar may use different drilling, facing or dimensions. Confirm the complete flange designation rather than relying on nominal size and pressure class alone. The selected gasket must also suit the flange facing, medium, temperature and surface finish. Installing a new valve betw...
    View More
first page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 last page
[  A total of  52  pages]

Leave a message

    If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.

Home

Products

about

contact